Archive for February, 2008

Data Portability needs a new logo because of RedHate

February 23, 2008

Red Hat uses the 2,300 year old sign for infinity which is a sideways 8 to carve out the letter F for Fedora Core. Dataportability.org, the most user centric act on the Internet right now, received a C&D for having a similar logo. (they look nothing alike besides the similar use of the infinite symbol.) They use the infinite symbol to show that we will have to sign up for an infinite amount of web sites in our life time without the D in Data Portability. The only similarities are the letter usage inside the logo and the fact that they are similar shades of blue. Unreal, Red Hat just lost a fan or two I’m sure. At any rate, the folks behind Dataportabilityorg are busy trying to help us, the users, and so they have asked folks to start a logo design content. If you are handy with a Wacom tablet or love chilling in front of Photoshop or The Gimp, give it a shot! Eat that Red Hate! =P

dplogo.png 

Does this logo in any way whatsoever cause you to think of RedHat? I think not. But who am I do judge?

 

Update, here is my attempt. I’m not the best with logos but I gave it a shot. Tried to capture the spirit of the original and make it seem like the user is "on the go."

DataPortability_Rev2

 

 

 

 

 

 

What if Yahoo! took the GNU Pill?

February 23, 2008

Microsoft says it’s the engineers that are valuable to the company but would Microsoft still be willing to pay 42 billion for the company if Yahoo! opened the source to most of its services like Yahoo! Pipes for instance? Many companies operate profitably by using the community that loves them to not only monetize their product but improve it. I look at Sun Microsystems as one such visionary company who can operate under this type of license but I don’t think Microsoft could. They just paid billions for MySQL.

In a world where execution, ideas, and the ability to bring it all together matter the most, what would happen if Yahoo took the ultimate Microsoft poison pill? Would Microsoft be GNU’ed off? Would Yahoo’s net value plummet or would a new Yahoo! cult following gathering lift them in the air like a pillar above Google and them all? Just like the pillar of semantic goodness they currently are at this point; Yahoo makes all of it’s money of the people and eyeballs who visit the sites they have created.

They probably wouldn’t even have to open source their search and advertising platforms for it to make Microsoft change its mind. What are your thoughts? As I write this, I feel a bit silly, and stupid and ignorant but sometimes that’s what it takes to form an answer to a problem. What would happen if Yahoo did do this? What if it stopped the buyout. What if it saved Yahoo? I might need some protection I think. $42 billion dollars is a lot of money so it will probably never happen but what the hell. Maybe they are just going to try to stall until a change at the White House happens.

John Kounios, Neuropsychologia, and my little GeekSpeaker 2.0

February 15, 2008
Long week… It’s been a few months of crazy Synchronicity for me. I’d like to proudly say that if things turn out okay, chances are I’m going to be a father this year. I can’t say how much that’s changed me in the small amount of time I’ve found out. Many other things–changes–have happened in the last month with me too. I need a Tom-Tom for Life.

Getting ready to head back home from Menlo Park CA. Being outside has felt like a vacation and I feel horrible I didn’t get to see my wife on Valentine’s day for the first time in the 15 years I’ve known her.

Gotta finish packing up. I’ll do some blogging on my Chicago layover tomorrow. I found a cheap round trip but it’s got a 3 hour leg there. Not the best layover location if you like the Sun and live in Ohio.

I learned more in the last week than any previous week about the company in which I’ve spent the last ten years working.  I’m also learning more about my strengths and weaknesses. I’m learning to become a better researcher (slowly). I’ve always considered myself a thinker (I constantly think about everything) and now I’ve got take those cycles and make them more effective.  A bit like the Intel and AMD has done lately with their processors. I’m feeling a sense of failure that I’ve never felt before and it’s driving me a bit crazy.

I’ve always been a person who has done my best to put my company’s interests before my own in many regards and I’ve always tried to think about how best to help my company. I also want to change the world in a good way. I’ve always preached that everyone should do a similar thing. I’m trying to learn to solve problems quicker and I never knew it but I REALLY SUCK at solving problems quickly. I can solve problems, but it takes "Pondering" for me. My left brain can solve many problems quickly, but none that require creative thinking. Also, in my experience I am less effective at solving things creatively while under great stress.

I have to change that. I did a little searching around tonight and I’m trying to figure out why this occurs for me. The Jury is still out but I’d like to start looking into the work done by John Kounios–a neurophychologia expert–after reading this study excerpt. He seems to find that there is evidence between the way people solve problems and that there are logical differences between people who think and have an "aha moment" and those who are disciplined at solving problems logistically.

Most if not all of my greatest ideas have come after a useless day of trying to solve a problem and then when I’m half asleep the problem I’ve been working on all day hits me and I have to get up out of bed and write it down and then I can pick up on it, in the morning. Or at the very least when my brain starts to slow down or ramp down from that thinking session.

The more I think about something the I have these aha moments. I have to change, I have to learn to use the weaker (left) side of my brain so that I can solve problems more quickly. I don’t ever give up, so now I’m more determined than ever to learn the disciplines of a great researcher. I know I can do it, I’m a bit ambidextrous. I’ve learned to eat with my right hand in close quarters so that I don’t bump elbows with people who are sitting next to me for instance.

XML: Happy Ten Years! Bring on the Semantic Web!

February 11, 2008

XML is ten years old today. If you have a good 15-20 minutes you can learn about the thinking and a little bit about the history and the people behind the spec over at Tbray.org. I’m getting ready to fly out to Silicon Valley and I’m meeting with a fellow research person who’s husband wrote something called AdXML. I’m not sure if it ever caught on, or if it’s in use today. I’ve never had much time lately to blog or even look any of this stuff up. I’ve been busy inventing and innovating lately a bit myself, or trying to do the best I can to do so. I have a bunch of presentations and I’ve actually been working on my own XML spec which I’m not at liberty to talk about. Big companies are starting to understand the benefits of open innovation though. XML took quite a bit of time to catch on really. Much like it’s going to take Data Portability, and open IM networks to catch on. If they don’t provide the customers the benefits of these improvements, they will go to someone who does. Programmers want to be able to attach to services these days more than API’s even. 

Today because of people like Theodore Holm Nelson, Timothy Berners-Lee, Charles F. Goldfarb,  we have a great Internet.  I’m learning with a bit of difficulty what Microsoft needs to learn, you need to be a more open company and just inspire your workforce to produce better products.

You can’t innovate as a company anymore, you have to be a part of a larger group of people that help each other out these days in order to get the job done to provide customers the value they are starting to see more from machines, and less from people. (Customer Service Gets worse every year.) Speaking of ten years, it’s been ten long years sense I’ve been to silicon valley. I have so much going on in my life right now that I can’t keep up with it all. I’m surrounded by good friends and we are starting a weekend "Hobby" that we think will be pretty cool for customers. I’ve been laser focused on doing everything I can to change an industry. Just like these guys who were behind XML did.

Yahoo!-o-Soft vs. Appoogle (Microsoft+Yahoo! vs Google+Apple) Part II

February 5, 2008

Last May I was thinking that this was the end game, and now it appears as though I might not be to far from the mark. Microsoft has exceeded my expectations in the cloud since last May when I first thought about what value could be gained if all four giants merged and a new double strength war for user’s hearts, minds, keyboard strokes and money began. Scoble doesn’t understand yet the power of a rich client and a rich cloud. Scoble, people don’t throw 41 billion at something unless they understand and believe that it is a solution to something. Not that I even understand, I have learned the dangers of hubris. (Slowly) The WSJ even thinks Microsoft stands no chance I guess.

Microsoft

You are proposing a value proposition to the many shareholders of Yahoo! as we speak. You are talking to government officials, the one most important thing you are not doing is talking to your customers and possible future customers. You need to make promises for an open future. When you reward customers with value, especially free value, they reward you, they talk good things about you, they like your products when they suck even.

When existing value that is provided by the marketplace is taken away from consumers, your brand name suffers. You can not make your products "valuable" by sucking up the competition any longer. The marketplace in the 90’s was guided by your forward thinking but we are a smarter, more diverse crowd of technologists these days and many of us are futurists, we are rooting that the future is a good one and that the average Joe’s benefit is at the center of every product.

What you need is to have a conversation with your customers, letting them know that you will start supporting open source products. Not sudo-source, stupid source, sloppy source, or legacy-source, open source. I’m not saying throw your cash cows in the fire but experiment with your overlap that this purchase creates. Don’t throw all your eggs and chickens in the same basket. Think of all of those implications. I’ve realized many of them. Many of them require you opening up and letting a the competition have a shot. Your largest gain is the human capital that comes with Yahoo as I said when I first thought about this merger almost a year ago. Those in the valley are some of the smartest in the world. They are all thinking about the customers more and less about the competition.

I mean paint and Flikr combined is unstoppable in the Market. (Just kidding) There is a definite plus side to all of this you know people. First of all it will actually really get Apple fired up about moving the OS space even further forward, it will get the Linux crowed roaring because it further distinguishes Linux as an OS that mirrors consumer needs, and not marketplace power plays. What’s missing isn’t what Robert Scoble is talking about, he’s a smart guy but he has it all wrong. Maybe your mantra could be do the right thing. Stimulate the marketplace, not destroy. Making your products work together best is no longer the best solution because you now are in a position to make the market more pleased than even Google has. Karma is true. Competition is good, complement the competition, don’t call them names, respect them verbally and treat them like good people which they are and when you are all done kick their ass on merit alone.

Build your brand back up, it’s your only chance at long term success.

Google:

Give Steve a call, .Mac still sucks.

,

Microsoft + Yahoo better not Kill Zimbra or any open initiative by Yahoo!

February 2, 2008

Microsoft, you need to focus on providing brand value to your users. This is good advice too!  If you want to grow, you have to find ways to reach out to those users who love open source. Many of us love Apple and Google and yes even Linux. It is well known that Microsoft doesn’t utilize very well the open source model (some would go much further in this statement) and I think that’s the best thing Microsoft could do especially when you start talking about the Internet. If you love them, treat them like your kids, give them freebies like Google, and Live Writer 😛 they will love you.

Just a little advice, I want to see you add value to Zimbra, so if you do complete this takeover of Yahoo–it was under a license that even you could swallow (Very conservative quasi open source)–DON’T FREAKING KILL IT!

I love that program, even though it’s a little slow and the license could be more liberal. You can put value on the table and food at the same time! What I mean by killing it is ending the open source development of it. You will find many companies are looking for cheaper alternatives than exchange and if you do buy Yahoo, you’ll have one.

One last thing. I love all technology companies and I know that if they try to help each other and help themselves that is the ultimate model of innovation, or really, just creating constant customer value.

On the positive side, Wow, so much could be done, watch out Google? Hmm, it would be close! You are falling behind Microsoft because your best engineers are aging and you are spread too thin.