Archive for June, 2007

RIAA sued for malicious prosecution, invasion of privacy, libel and slander, and deceptive business practices.

June 26, 2007

AT&T’s new friends, the RIAA are finally getting called out on the horror they have been releasing on the innocent public. AT&T is just now coming around to seeing things the RIAA’s way when the American people are finding how just how horrible and ugly this organization has been acting.

The amount of crap I have heard is unsettling, from 90 year old ladies who have never sat in front of a computer being forced into settling with the RIAA or get sued, to small children, the acts which have been endorsed and executed by the RIAA and thus it’s supporting labels and yes, partners in crime such as AT&T should it follow through on it’s plans to start spying on the American people.

Post 911, we now live in a world where it seems okay for companies to spy on us, we must bring up a large collective shield which forces our freedoms back, we must not tolerate any who might take our freedoms away, freedom which cost the lives of many Americans.

Finally, someone understands how malicious these people are acting. Cowardly executives who would steal from artists and the American people’s pockets and liberties, all in the same breath. I for one will not stand for it any longer.

Google Looks to Extend Microsoft’s Iron Ball and Chain to Foot Decree

June 26, 2007

According to Reuters, Google has asked a federal judge today to extend the consent decree that settled the antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. supposedly in order to address competition concerns involving the Windows Vista operating system.

Previously, Google has complained that Microsoft was unwilling to let Google outbid an OS function native to Windows since it’s early days to Google. Google would like to offer user’s more choice, by outbidding Microsoft at Dell and thereby shoving Google Desktop down user’s throats.

As I’ve said before, I think if Microsoft invents something new and even remotely novel, they should be allowed to incorporate it into the OS. Desktop search in itself, doesn’t give Microsoft an edge in any other arena.

If the case is pushed in favor of Windows, all companies can rejoice besides Microsoft. This means I can sue Microsoft because they don’t provide user’s a choice at the Default Icons, Linux might want to implement a Linux Kernel into Windows, and why not give user’s choice there?

At the end of the day, Google is no better than any other company. Why is it that other programmers have no problem earning hard earned cash by programming for Windows? It wouldn’t be popular if it wasn’t the most powerful platform to code for. By whining in federal court, I feel you loose much of your prestige, this is not the same as Netscape, as far as I can see (I’m not saying that there might be much I don’t see) I’ve seen Microsoft do nothing but be more than willing to spend money and resources on giving its competitors and equal footing everywhere they can possibly imagine.

When you go bitch to Microsoft about this Google, just remember, you are getting awfully close to a monopoly in Search and online advertising, and I am a true believer in you reap what you sow, just as Microsoft has been.  

Let me try to reiterate this one more time. Google, Microsoft has been providing Desktop Search before you existed. When Microsoft showed off the power of instant search at the WWDC (or was it WINHEC?) over a half a decade ago, you and Apple and even the folks over at a certain Beagle Linux camp, scrambled to try and copy the technology as fast as you could. Even though you beat Microsoft to the punch, they invented this crap, and you didn’t.

By you claiming you want to offer users more choice in public, and then behind closed doors, you pay every cent you can to make sure your own choice gets stuffed down user’s throats, you are acting more evil than Microsoft. Now if you were going to bat for user’s, and you were pushing for something that would totally benefit users like a customization wizard when a new Windows profile was created, then you would be a holy warrior.

Until then you are loosing Karma and Goodwill brand name power. When you let your lawyers do the thinking for you, you risk alienating all of those developers like myself that do nothing but say good things about you. I knew some day you would become this thing and yet I always hoped you wouldn’t. Make all of your departments stand on the moral high ground just as your privacy group is doing, don’t force your product down user’s throat, fight for real choice.

How would you like it if someone offered a cookie on a Dell PC that would insert the results and ads from your competitors when they typed something into Google.com? I’m going to assume that you also like to improve Google products without your competitors whining to federal court. Just because the EU whines doesn’t mean you should be doing so, it sounds lame and you are the only one really doing it these days.

Just another note, I have never earned a cent from Microsoft, I don’t really consider myself a fanboy even, they piss me off all the time too, I just think the most sickening thing is folks who side against companies when they shouldn’t, I own Apple products, I am and avid Linux user and I simply just love technology and I hope that it keeps getting better and better faster and faster. I think it’s a justice to all involved in technology to have an intelligent conversation about the politics that can creep into the field. I’m not always right but I do try to call the shots as I see them, and I am constantly not agreeing with the crowd.

American Policies on Spying, Now Causing Harm to Our Business Sectors

June 21, 2007

The BBC is reporting that the French government has mandated that it’s officials are not allowed to use Blackberries because of fears that foreigners could spy on them.

Workers in the French president’s and prime minister’s office have been told their e-mails risk falling into foreign hands, Le Monde newspaper reports.

Rim responded by saying that the US National security Agency did not have the ability to to view the content of any data communication sent through Blackberry servers.

This is the problem! Much of the data that comes from Canada heads south to hit major US backbones (much of which is owned by AT&T). This data–once on the United States soil–is subject the undisclosed spying policy and procedure as I’ve said previously.

AT&T is largely responsible for letting the NSA and perhaps other agencies spy on American’s and it recently announced that it would also start spying traffic for copyrighted content to help record labels in their illegal lawsuits against ordinary innocent hardworking American people. That basically to me means that not only does AT&T think our constitutional right to privacy is less important than security and politics, but our right to privacy is less important than their income.

The French officials are right to be concerned. We live in a world where security engineers get the top dollar from government agencies for disclosing flaws in operating systems so that the government can get into people’s PC’s that are "terrorists" I would assume.

The only other thing I can offer to those of you who don’t trust the government anymore is a product called Peer Guardian, it blocks all of the known spying locations out there. I don’t think it does a whole lot of good with the dirt tactics employed at the NSA.

Big Surprise: FBI Finds it Frequently Overstepped in Collecting Data

June 15, 2007

This is the entire reason behind my whole Boycott AT&T reasoning. Check this out, a recent report by the Justice Department found that even the FBI, not considering what the hell AT&T has let the NSA do to our privacy, has violated th law or agency rules more than 1,000 times. If that’s true, it’s probably 100 times worse than what they found. The company has decided to put its users wishes behind the wishes and needs of its shareholders. The event, is one of many in which I see as an eroding away of our Constitutional rights. We have a right to privacy damnit, and I am not going to sit around and let the almighty dollar stand in the way of the freedoms that people who actually have souls died defending. If AT&T does do this network spy tech, there are going to be "illegal Events" like this and we have a responsibility to stand up and let these companies know that we WILL NOT TOLERATE IT!

Safari for Windows Public Beta Downloads Top 1 Million in 48 HRS

June 15, 2007

 

Safari for Windows images

Safari for Windows Public Beta Downloads Top 1 Million in First 48 Hours

CUPERTINO, California—June 14, 2007—Apple® today announced that more than 1 million copies of Safari™ for Windows were downloaded in the first 48 hours since the free public beta was made available on Monday. Safari 3 is the world’s fastest and easiest-to-use browser, and is available as a free download at www.apple.com/safari.

Apple always makes funny claims about their products. Like it’s the Fastest and the easiest-to-use browser. I think that’s funny, why must the browser be easier to use? Still this is pretty impressive and like I said earlier this week, harden the Safari Vector, and then you can release OSX86. You heard it here first.

Boycott AT&T

June 13, 2007

I am a current customer of AT&T, and have been for the last 4-5 years, and even though I am locked in until next year, I will boycott AT&T after the contract is done. It’s important to note that although I’m not a pirate, I am a natural enemy of the RIAA, and not a big fan of AT&T’s track privacy record when it comes to letting just about anyone spy on it’s users, and I am also going to take a stand for every person who ever died defending the real freedoms of this country when I say I think we all need to band together and wholeheartedly Boycott AT&T for these repeated offenses against our constitutional rights.

Not only has AT&T let the NSA spy on all of its users, they haven’t come forward to let the user’s know what they have done, they are most likely still spying on users and they have never issued an apology to it’s users for letting the government spy on us which has been found to be illegal. It’s now going to willingly sell the information about users who are trading pirated content. This also means that they will end up inadvertently blocking legitimate uses on it’s networks. To recap what I am saying, AT&T is showing right off the bat that they do not, will not, and never did care about it’s consumers, the only thing they care about in the slightest bit is trying to extort as much money out of every customer they have to their fullest existent. I was thinking about getting an iPhone, now I will not.

As a United States Citizen who values freedom, I will no longer give money to a company who has repeatedly shown they don’t care about our first amendment rights, and I intend to not only do something about it myself by boycotting them, I will also try to talk everyone I know into boycotting their services until they hopefully go bankrupt. I will switch to Verizon, who has a strong track record for keeping the data of it’s user’s private.

AT&T, you made a big mistake, you put your own interests before the interests of your own users when you sided with The RIAA. The RIAA not only stands for stopping Piracy, but they also stand for taking away the money from artists, have backed new contracts that would limit the amount of money going to the artists, and increase the amount going to useless greedy executives who add no value to the system (much like AT&T) and I’m also tired of the way you rip me off. (When I used some data, I tried to go to my account online and sign up for a data plan, but AT&T blocks you out of signing up for a data plan, until that period is over, so they can rape you for charges.)

I hope you die a long, miserable painful death as a company and I hope whoever is responsible for compromising the privacy of customers at your company gets canned, and in general has a miserable life.  

Safari For Windows, The Second Step in a Process to Move OSX to Generic Hardware

June 13, 2007

If anyone downloaded and installed Safari for Windows they took part in what I feel is Apple’s second trial they must complete in order for them to be able to release OSX on generic hardware and compete directly with Windows.

 safari_install copy

You might think that would never happen but I think it is happening and I think Apple has recently taken steps which clearly show this will happen.

1. Move OSX to X86. This one was obvious, but Apple has spent the last few years refining the code, the IDE’s and all of the tools that developers require to not only have a sufficient base of working code on the new OSX, but also get to work on tools that will let developers quickly port windows code over to OSX 86.

Also, I want to mention recently Apple released code that was very easily hacked to run on more than just Apple hardware. This software is called OSX86, it works fine installing on a lot of hardware, hardware that Apple hasn’t even ever touched. How is this possible?

3. Safari for Windows. The last thing Apple wanted to have happen was the nightmare which exposed OSX for it’s horrible security vulnerabilities. While OSX as a whole might be vulnerable, the Unix underpinnings sure are stable and have rock solid stacks that have stood the test of time. So if you are Apple, when you release your Operating system in the wild, the one thing you must be able to do is have a browser, that is in the hands of millions of hackers, (which it hasn’t been) so that it can start getting some of the callus that the other two browsers have had. In this way, OSX isn’t getting as bad (they are finding cross OSX ZDV via safari) of a rep as if they would have release OSX on X86 hardware today, but they are tuning up their software, so within the next few years I really expect to see this all unfold. It will be the OS wars of the 90’s but good old Bill Gates won’t be around this time.

Google Starts Whining About Vista Desktop Search, a Microsoft Innovation

June 11, 2007
I love you Google but this whining crap really kills your brand name. Microsoft invented these instant search features, the "Windows key-n-type" feature is one feature for which we owe ode to Microsoft, and other features you want control of are patented, and Apple copied them (granted both Apple and Google got their product to market first) and now Google is whining that they can’t turn off Microsoft’s own Desktop Search Index and fill all of the OS boxes and patented features with their own products.

So basically, Microsoft pays for the R&D for inventing something new, others copy them, and still others feel like they should be able to outbid Microsoft for a feature they invented on their on freaking operating system.

What’s next, are you going to complain that Microsoft should let you put your own kernel in, and get rid of their kernel? Microsoft should have to pay Dell to include it’s own kernel with Vista? Should you be able to bid Microsoft out of having Outlook install by default to work with Exchange? Pay Dell to Make Outlook work by default with only Gmail? The real ugly part about this is the fact that the company who says they do no evil are in fact lying, stating that this gives users less choice. That’s entirely wrong, you want to stuff Google products down user’s as well, you don’t pop up a wizard asking the user what they want and Microsoft has taken zero actions to stop you from distributing your own desktop search, and when you don’t let Live.com be a search provider choice in Firefox (not that anyone would use it…) you are complaining about the same thing that you do. How is forcing Microsoft to bid on it’s own features going to help the end user out? I totally understood that the browser search feature but that’s because Microsoft could then have an advantage over you in your own territory, search.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/319231_msftgoogle09ww.html

If I am totally wrong, please someone slap me and show me how I’m wrong. I love Google they are perhaps one of my favorite companies but you can’t take something which Microsoft practically invented and force them to cede control of it to you. We are not talking about internet search here Google, and let’s face it, Microsoft doesn’t have the claws it had in the 90’s, and there is a lot of FOG out there.

Please do start whining when Microsoft takes away your ability to use your software on their operating system which they haven’t (AFAIK), you have just as much ability to compete as they do. Remember, you didn’t invent the "Start, Type Feature, if you did things would be different." (Too many people think this an Apple invention in Finder when Microsoft unveiled it long before anyone else.) Google, release a freagin Google OS or quit whining, this is almost as annoying as Microsoft and the whole Linux thing.

I just want to remind folks that I have zero interest in Microsoft financially or in any other way…. One of the key social cool things to do are to bash Microsoft no matter what… In other words, I don’t know any A list bloggers who defend Microsoft when they should.

Sun has the Vision, but lacks Execution

June 6, 2007

Google executed for them. That’s Rich Karlgaard over at Forbes view on Sun Microsystems. Mine if fairly similar as I’ve said before, Sun always has the vision, and others scoop it from their hands and hit a home run. If they could only execute their vision they could get their stock price up Rich, it’s just a matter of if when and how.

Firefox 3, Codename Gran Paradiso’s Looking Very Cool

June 3, 2007

Alex Faaborg, a user experience designer working on FireFox 3, writes about some of the new features and looks with the new client.

Firefox 3 is going to provide a wide range of improvements to performance, stability, and security, and it’s also going to present several new user facing features. Here is a quick recap of design work that’s been going on in the Mozilla community over the past few weeks for Firefox 3, along with information about how you can help contribute, by providing feedback on these designs, or creating your own UI mockups.

So far the feature set is looking like this:

1. "Places" Mozilla’s brand name for their online Bookmarking service. which uses tagging ala Del.icio.us.

It will be interesting to see whether user’s start using Firefox over delicious. Most user’s have a Del.ici.ous button on their browser already but this looks a bit more refined than the service that everyone fell in love with two years ago.

placesBookmark.jpg_large[1]

2. Malware Detection: Firefox will work seamlessly with the Google back-end that stores information about sites that are known Malware distributors.

malwareProtection[1]

3. Task Based UI for Downloaded Manager.

Very cool, will even handle Micro-formats, and give the option memorize decisions, with RSS parsing to detect the type of content in the RSS feeds, will warn users before opening .exe and other dangerous files.

Contenthandling

4. Interesting Anti-phishing technology

The actual domain would get bolded in the web address bar, this would dissuade some web novice from clicking on questionable "Banking" links. locationBar[1]

5. Private Browsing

The ability to use Firefox to Browser the Internet privately in a session that doesn’t store any data locally about the session and what the user did. This is great for privacy avocets especially if they can put pressure on Microsoft to do the same thing. I’m not sure how useful this would be though, ISP’s store location information for a certain period of time but it would be great if you were using a libraries computer and didn’t want to expose your username for instance. The URL bar would turn black while in a private session possibly.

privateBrowsingStealthBar[1]

6. And More… 

A few other features that are also on our radar, but don’t currently have any UI mockups yet:

  • Offline Web applications
  • Improvements to the password manager
  • A graphical keyboard-based UI similar to Quicksilver and Enso for searching the Web, bookmarking and tagging pages, navigating recent history, and switching between tabs. Note: this feature isn’t in the Firefox 3 PRD, and it will probably be released as an experimental extension through Mozilla Labs before it gets considered for inclusion into Firefox.

 

All in all, I’m loving the direction Firefox 3 is heading. No information currently on backwards compatibility of previous plug-ins but I’ll be following these developments closely.